
Distinguished Polish philosopher and historian of ideas. He is best known for his critical analysis of Marxist thought, especially his acclaimed three-volume history, Main Currents of Marxism. In his later work, Kolakowski increasingly focused on religious questions. In his 1986 Jefferson Lecture, he asserted that "We learn history not in order to know how to behave or how to succeed, but to know who we are.” In Poland, Kołakowski is not only revered as a philosopher and historian of ideas, but also as an icon for opponents of communism. Adam Michnik has called Kołakowski "one of the most prominent creators of contemporary Polish culture". Kołakowski died on 17 July 2009, aged 81, in Oxford, England. In his obituary, philosopher Roger Scruton said Kolakowski was a "thinker for our time" and that regarding Kolakowski's debates with intellectual opponents, "even if ... nothing remained of the subversive orthodoxies, nobody felt damaged in their ego or defeated in their life's project, by arguments which from any other source would have inspired the greatest indignation."
by Leszek Kołakowski
Rating: 4.4 ⭐
• 2 recommendations ❤️
Leszek Kolakowski’s masterpiece, one of the twentieth century’s most important books―for the first time in a one-volume paperback. Renowned philosopher Leszek Kolakowski was one of the first scholars to reveal both the shortcomings and the dangers posed by communist regimes. He now presents, for the first time in one paperback volume, his definitive Main Currents of Marxism : “A prophetic work,” according to the Library of Congress, that provides “the most lucid and comprehensive history of the origins, structure, and posthumous development of the system of thought that had the greatest impact on the 20th century.”
Wznowienie w jednym tomie trzech serii cieszących się ogromną popularnością Mini-wykładów o maxi-sprawach Leszka Kołakowskiego. Znakomity filozof, pierwszy laureat prestiżowej nagrody im. Johna Klugego, amerykańskiego Nobla w dziedzinie nauk humanistycznych, zajmuje się w swoich mini-wykładach także zagadnieniami z pozoru mało filozoficznymi: sławą, podróżami, długami, zabobonami i terroryzmem. Przenikliwość i poczucie humoru Autora pozwalają mu na zaskakujące i celne obserwacje dotyczące zarówno życia codziennego, jak i odwiecznych praw ludzkiej natury; gwarantują jednocześnie chwilę refleksji i prawdziwą czytelniczą przyjemność.
Can nature make us happy? How can we know anything? What is justice? Why is there evil in the world? What is the source of truth? Is it possible for God not to exist? Can we really believe what we see? There are questions that have intrigued the world's great thinkers over the ages, which still touch a chord in all of us today. They are questions that can teach us about the way we live, work, relate to each other and see the world. Here Leszek Kolakowski explores the essence of these ideas, introducing figures from Socrates to Thomas Aquinas, Descartes to Nietzsche, and concentrating on one single important philosophical question from each of them. Whether reflecting on good and evil, truth and beauty, faith and the soul, or free will and consciousness, Leszek Kolakowski shows that these timeless ideas remain at the very core of our existence.
'The most esteemed philosopher to have produced a general introduction to his discipline since Bertrand Russell' IndependentIn these essays, one of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century writes about communism and socialism, the problem of evil, Erasmus and the reform of the Church, reason and truth, and whether God is happy. Accessible and absorbing, the essays in Is God Happy? deal with some of the eternal problems of philosophy and the most vital questions of our age.Leszek Kolakowski has also written on religion, Spinoza, Bergson, Pascal and seventeenth-century thought. He left communist Poland after his expulsion from Warsaw University for anti-communist activities. From 1970 he was a fellow of All Souls College, Oxford.'His distinctive mix of irony and moral seriousness, religious sensibility and epistemological scepticism, social engagement and political doubt was truly rare ... a true Central European intellectual-perhaps the last' Tony Judt, The New York Times Review of Books
For over a century, philosophers have argued that philosophy is impossible or useless, or both. Although the basic notion dates back to the days of Socrates, there is still heated disagreement about the nature of truth, reality, knowledge, the good, and God. This may make little practical difference to our lives, but it leaves us with a feeling of radical uncertainty, a feeling described by Kolakowski as "metaphysical horror." "The horror is this," he says, "if nothing truly exists except the Absolute, the Absolute is nothing; if nothing truly exists except myself, I am nothing." The aim of this book, for Kolakowski, is finding a way out of this seeming dead end.In a trenchant analysis that serves as an introduction to nearly all of Western philosophy, Kolakowski confronts these dilemmas head on through examinations of several prominent philosophers including Descartes, Spinoza, Husserl, and many of the Neo-Platonists. He finds that philosophy may not provide definitive answers to the fundamental questions, yet the quest itself transforms our lives. It may undermine most of our certainties, yet it still leaves room for our spiritual yearnings and religious beliefs.The final sentence of the book captures the hopefulness that has survived the horror of nothingness when Kolakowski asks: "Is it not reasonable to suspect that if existence were pointless and the universe devoid of meaning, we would never have achieved not only the ability to imagine otherwise, but even the ability to entertain this very thought—to wit, that existence is pointless and the universe devoid of meaning?" The answer, of course, is clear. Now it is up to readers to take up the challenge of his arguments.
This volume contains two unusual and appealing satirical works by the well-known European philosopher Kolakowski. The first, Tales from the Kingdom of Lailonia, is set in a fictional land. Each story illustrates some aspect of human inability to come to terms with imperfection, infinitude, history, and nature. The second, The Key to Heaven, is a collection of seventeen biblical tales from the Old Testament told in such a way that the story and the moral play off each other to illustrate political, moral, or existential foibles and follies.
Leszek Kolakowski discusses, in a highly original way, the arguments for and against the existence of God as they have been conducted through the ages. He examines the critiques of religious belief, from the Epicureans through Nietzsche to contemporary anthropological inquiry, the assumptions that underlie them, and the counter-arguments of such apologists as Descartes, Leibniz, and Pascal. His exploration of the philosophy of religion covers the historical discussions of the nature and existence of evil, the importance of the concepts of failure and eternity to the religious impulse, the relationship between skepticism and mysticism, and the place of reason, understanding, and in models of religious thought. He examines why people, throughout known history, have cherished the idea of eternity and existence after death, and why this hope has been dependent on the worship of an eternal reality. He confronts the problems of meaning in religious language.
by Leszek Kołakowski
Rating: 4.2 ⭐
Traces the development of Marxism and its impact on Soviet culture
Leszek Kolakowski delves into some of the most intellectually vigorous questions of our time in this remarkable collection of essays garnished with his characteristic wit. Ten of the essays have never appeared before in English."Exemplary. . . . It should be celebrated." —Arthur C. Danto, New York Times Book Review"This book . . . express[es] Kolakowski's thought on God, man, reason, history, moral truth and original sin, prompted by observation of the dramatic struggle among Christianity, the Enlightenment and modern totalitarianism. It is a wonderful collection of topics." —Thomas Nagel, Times Literary Supplement"No better antidote to bumper-sticker thinking exists than this collection of 24 'appeals for moderation in consistency,' and never has such an antidote been needed more than it is now." —Joseph Coates, Chicago Tribune"Whether learned or humorous, these essays offer gems in prose of diamond hardness, precision, and brilliance." —Thomas D'Evelyn, The Christian Science MonitorA "Notable Books of the Year 1991" selection, New York Times Book Review —a "Noted with Pleasure" selection, New York Times Book Review —a "Summer Reading 1991" selection, New York Times Book Review —a "Books of the Year" selection, The Times .
Dobrych podręczników, słowników i encyklopedii jest pod dostatkiem. Nie zamierzam „streszczać” Platona, Kartezjusza czy Husserla, byłaby to śmieszna ambicja. Chciałbym mówić o wielkich filozofach w taki sposób, by u każdego wyłowić jedną myśl, która dla niego samego jest ważna, należy do filarów domu, jaki zbudował, a zarazem dla nas, teraz jest zrozumiała, jakąś strunę w naszym umyśle potrąca.(od Autora)Pierwsza część książkowej wersji wykładów O co nas pytają wielcy filozofowie powstała na podstawie programu emitowanego przez TVP 2 i była publikowana na łamach „Tygodnika Powszechnego”.
"[An] important essay by a philosopher who more convincingly than any other I can think of demonstrates the continuing significance of his vocation in the life of our culture."—Karsten Harries, The New York Times Book ReviewWith The Presence of Myth , Kolakowski demonstrates that no matter how hard man strives for purely rational thought, there has always been-and always will be-a reservoir of mythical images that lend "being" and "consciousness" a specifically human meaning."Kolakowski undertakes a philosophy of culture which extends to all realms of human intercourse—intellectual, artistic, scientific, and emotional. . . . [His] book has real significance for today, and may well become a classic in the philosophy of culture."— Anglican Theological Review
Najwybitniejszy polski filozof komentuje słynne cytaty filozoficzne.Od „Wiem, że nic nie wiem” Sokratesa, przez „Myślę, więc jestem” Kartezjusza, aż po „Rzeczywistość nie istnieje” Baudrillarda – „Ułamki filozofii” to wybór kilkudziesięciu znanych myśli wielkich filozofów, od antyku po współczesność, uzupełnionych refleksjami Leszka Kołakowskiego. Poruszają najważniejsze kwestie filozoficzne: problem poznania i prawdy, istnienia świata i istnienia Boga, dobra i zła, świadomości i wolności. Leszek Kołakowski, prowadząc czytelnika przez tę bardzo skrótową i osobistą historię filozofii, opatruje słynne zdania wnikliwym, czasem przewrotnym lub krytycznym komentarzem. Ułamki filozofii to oryginalna zachęta do własnych rozważań filozoficznych, inspirująca lektura dla każdego czytelnika.
Seria błyskotliwych i głębokich wykładów na tematy z pozoru mało filozoficzne. Autor łączy swą rozległą erudycję z przenikliwością, poczuciem humoru i zaskakującymi obserwacjami dotyczącymi zarówno codziennego życia, jak i odwiecznych praw rządzących ludzkimi dążeniami, słabościami i namiętnościami. Kołakowski zajmuje się zagadnieniami takimi, jak władza, sława, kłamstwo, podróże. Prezentowane w telewizji miniwykłady znakomitego filozofa cieszyły się wielkim powodzeniem. W wydaniu książkowym zostały uzupełnione dodatkowymi tekstami (m.in. o nudzie, o luksusie).
Very few academic philosophers can write about philosophy in a way that attracts the attention of those outside academia; even fewer can write with equal scholarly competence about something that transcends their narrow academic concerns; much less to have written about philosophy in such a way that it gave such a headache to Communist authorities or the leaders of the Western Left, as Leszek Kolakowski. In his title essay, "My Correct Views on Everything" (Kolakowski's famous rejoinder to E. P. Thompson's "Open Letter to L. Kolakowski"), the former Communist "High Priest" accounts for his apostasy from communism and explains why communism had to fail. Next, in a number of scholarly articles, he explains why communism assumed the pernicious form it had. There are two other sections, on Christianity and Liberal ideologies. Included are also two interviews with the author. Far from believing that the author has "correct views on everything," the reader is likely to be convinced that Kolakowski is right on more than one point. One's rejection of Marxist ideology does not have to lead, Kolakowski implicitly suggests, to the dismissal of the Marxist dream of a world without greed. Being critical of this or that item in the Church's politics should not have to make one reject Jesus's teaching. Finally, being concerned with liberalism's inability to generate moral values should not lead us past the compelling reasons to accept the liberal state as the only viable political alternative both to the follies of the movement in the twentieth century and the dangers of religious theocratic temptations. What Kolakowski offers in his new collection of essays is, in short, a "catechism" for non-ideological Marxists, Catholic Christians, liberals and conservatives alike. Once again, Kolakowski offers his readers pleasure without equal.
by Leszek Kołakowski
Rating: 4.2 ⭐
Book by Leszek Kolakowski
by Leszek Kołakowski
Rating: 4.2 ⭐
God Owes Us Nothing reflects on the centuries-long debate in how do we reconcile the existence of evil in the world with the goodness of an omnipotent God, and how does God's omnipotence relate to people's responsibility for their own salvation or damnation. Leszek Kolakowski approaches this paradox as both an exercise in theology and in revisionist Christian history based on philosophical analysis. Kolakowski's unorthodox interpretation of the history of modern Christianity provokes renewed discussion about the historical, intellectual, and cultural omnipotence of neo-Augustinianism."Several books a year wrestle with that hoary conundrum, but few so dazzlingly as the Polish philosopher's latest."—Carlin Romano, Washington Post Book World"Kolakowski's fascinating book and its debatable thesis raise intriguing historical and theological questions well worth pursuing."—Stephen J. Duffy, Theological Studies"Kolakowski's elegant meditation is a masterpiece of cultural and religious criticism."—Henry Carrigan, Cleveland Plain Dealer
Teraz już wiecie, moi najmilsi, że nie tylko szatańskie podstępy zwalczać możecie, ale że całkiem łatwa to sprawa, łatwa - co mówię - najłatwiejsza w świecie, błahostka, rzecz śmieszna, bez trudu najmniejszego, bez wysiłku, kochani bracia, palcem kiwnąć wystarczy, a pada w proch piekielna machina i walą się rachuby nieczystej siły, jakże to łatwe, jakże proste, dziatki moje, jakże on słaby, ów mocarz ciemny, iż dziecko ledwie urodzone pyszne jego chytrości powalić może, broń z ręki wytrącić, byle tylko wiedzieć, byle wiedzieć dobrze, gołąbeczki, jak się do sprawy zabrać.
by Leszek Kołakowski
Rating: 3.9 ⭐
Libro usado en buenas condiciones, por su antiguedad podria contener señales normales de uso
Francuski rękopis o prowokacyjnym tytule „Jésus ridicule. Un essai apologétique et sceptique” został odnaleziony w archiwum Leszka Kołakowskiego. Ten napisany w połowie lat osiemdziesiątych i nieukończony esej jest refleksją o znaczeniu Jezusa, Jego przesłaniu i odbiorze tego przesłania w naszej kulturze. Myślę o Jezusie prawdziwym, a to znaczy: prawdziwie, rzeczywiście i niezbywalnie obecnym w naszej historii.Czy nasza kultura przeżyje, jeśli zapomni Jezusa? (...) Dlaczego potrzebujemy Jezusa?Czy był Bogiem? Nie mam pojęcia. Ale jeśli jakiś Boży człowiek żył kiedykolwiek na tej ziemi, był nim On.(fragment książki) Znak
Leszek Kołakowski explores questions asked by great philosophers, introducing us to the great ideas and philosophers of Western thought.
by Leszek Kołakowski
Rating: 3.7 ⭐
Pierwszy tom rozmów obejmuje okres do 1968 roku. Kołakowski opowiada Mentzlowi o dzieciństwie, okupacji, latach szkolnych, wstąpieniu do partii i dojrzewaniu intelektualnym oraz oczywiście o wyjeździe z Polski. Dzięki doskonale prowadzonej rozmowie poznajemy wiele nieznanych szczegółów z życia profesora Kołakowskiego, a zarazem panoramę epoki, w której żył. Znakomity styl i erudycja rozmówców sprawiają, że książka oprócz walorów faktograficznych ma także ogromną wartość literacką. Leszek Kołakowski – jeden z najwybitniejszych polskich myślicieli i filozofów, znany autorytet intelektualny i moralista. Czesław Miłosz nazywał go mędrcem. Z kolei Charles Taylor określał mianem „współczującego obserwatora wiary chrześcijańskiej”. Pisma profesora Kołakowskiego, wielokrotnie nagradzane i dyskutowane, weszły do kanonu myśli filozoficznej. Jest to myśl „balansująca”, myśl sceptyka i racjonalisty, a jednocześnie przenikliwego metafizyka.
Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski is renowned worldwide for wrestling with serious philosophical conundrums with dazzling elegance. In this new book, he turns his characteristic wit to important themes of ordinary life, from the need for freedom to the wheel of fortune, from the nature of God to the ambiguities of betrayal. Extremely lucid and lacking in intellectual pretension, these essays speak in everyday language, spurring the reader's own thoughts and providing a handle on which to debate and think about the themes. The eighteen essays cover the following topics: power, fame, equality, lying, toleration, travel, virtue, collective responsibility, the wheel of fortune, betrayal, violence, boredom, freedom, luxury, God, respect for nature, superstition, and national stereotypes.
Kolejny cykl wykładów telewizyjnych prof. Kołakowskiego emitowanych przez Program 2 TVP.W drugiej serii pytania zadają nam tacy mistrzowie, św.Tomasz z Akwinu, Wilhelm Ockham, Mikołaj z Kuzy, Kartezjusz, Leibniz, Pascal, Hume.A są to pytania m.in. o dobro, o to, czy zasady moralne mają charakter arbitralny, czy można wierzyć w Boga i twierdzić zarazem, że nic o Nim nie wiadomo.
Polish
"[Husserl] better than anybody, compelled us to realize the painful dilemma of knowledge: either consistent empiricism, with its relativistic, skeptical results (a standpoint which many regard discouraging, inadmissible, and in fact ruinous for culture) or transcendental dogmatism, which cannot really justify itself and remains in the end an arbitrary decision. I have to admit that although ultimate certitude is a goal that cannot be attained within the rationalist framework, our culture would be poor and miserable without people who keep trying to reach this goal, and it hardly could survive when left entirely in the hands of the skeptics." - From the author's conclusion. "Kolakowski's Husserl and the Search for Certitude consists of his three Cassirer Lectures, delivered at Yale in 1974. In broad, general terms, he places Husserl in the tradition of philosophers, from Descartes to the Logical positivists, who were engaged in the attempt to discover some knowledge which was certain and indubitable. His final view is that such a quest must fail. But he also argues that unless it is undertaken, the tension and disharmonies which exist between the claims of the skeptics and relativists on the one hand, and those who believe in the possibility of absolute certainty on the other, must come to an end. And since he believes that this tension is to a large extent the source of all culture and intellectual life, we should be disastrously impoverished if the search were finally given up. . . . [Kolakowski's] purpose is to show the ways in which Husserl pursued, and inevitably failed to reach, his goal, and to justify, at least in part, the claim he made for his philosophy, that iswas the defense of culture and civilization. The lectures are elegant, persuasively clear and delightful." - Mary Warnock, Times Literary Supplement
Kołakowski shows how Henri Bergson sought to reconcile Darwin's theory with his own beliefs about the nature of the universe. Bergson believed that time could be thought of in two different ways: as an abstract measuring device used for practical purposes, or as durée, the "real" time we actually experience. He also held that all matter is propelled by an internal élan vital, or life-drive, and that the life of the universe is constantly creative and unpredictable. On the basis of these ideas he constructed a system of thought that embraced his views on memory, matter, consciousness, movement, religious morality, and the nature of laughter. His pantheistic and dynamic vision of the universe, which emerged at a time of crisis in Western intellectual life, was symptomatic of the struggle between a rigid scientific determinism and the Christian tradition of a divine creation.
Książka zawiera 27 tekstów z lat 1967–1981, a więc z czasu, kiedy Kołakowski objęty był w Polsce zakazem druku. Podzielone na cztery części: Kłopoty z kulturą, Kłopoty z chrześcijaństwem, Kłopoty z socjalizmem i Kłopoty z Polską, wszystkie zmuszają czytelnika do opowiedzenia się za jedną z możliwości, z których każda jest niezadowalająca.Jest to pierwsze krajowe wydanie tej książki. Dotychczas miała ona dwie edycje w londyńskim wydawnictwie Aneks i kilka przedruków w podziemnych polskich oficynach.
Prezentowane w telewizji mini wykłady znakomitego filozofa cieszyły się od początku wielkim powodzeniem. Obecny tomik jest zapisem drugiego ich cyklu. W wydaniu książkowym znajduje się dziesięć znanych z telewizyjnego programu tekstów oraz trzy dodatkowe, których widzowie nie mieli okazji poznać. Wśród szkiców znajdują się m.in. teksty dotyczące Boga, szacunku dla natury, zabobonów, młodości, sumienia czy seksu. Ważne uzupełnienie bestsellerowego pierwszego tomu!
Книга про глибину поєднання філософії, релігії, життя людини, його протиріч та суперечностей. Колаковський відкриває інші матерії та парадигми, про які хочеться думати більше, в яких важливо розбиратися.Цю книгу можна читати знову і знову, по-новому переосмилюючи та проживаючи прочитане кожного разу з все більшою глибиною.Книга для тих, хто шукає відповіді на нелегкі питання людського життя.
Tematem kilkunastu tekstów zebranych w tej książce – spośród których część nigdy dotąd nie była publikowana – jest ludzki lęk przed śmiercią, a także możliwość opanowania tego lęku, stawienia mu czoła.To bardzo zróżnicowane teksty, pokazujące wszechstronność Kołakowskiego jako myśliciela, jak również jego głęboko ludzkie oblicze. Z równym zaangażowaniem i przenikliwością pisze filozof erudycyjny esej i list do nastoletniej czytelniczki, analizuje wielkie biblijne opowieści i wspomina tragicznie zmarłego przyjaciela.Wobec pytań o sprawy ostateczne, sens życia i śmierci, zawsze jesteśmy samotni. A jednak wielkość Kołakowskiego polega i na tym, że staje on wobec nich razem z czytelnikiem, obok niego. Nie w pozycji nauczyciela, ale jako towarzysz w poszukiwaniach.I choć jego myśl w swojej ostrości bywa bezlitosna – odsłaniając tę prawdę, że żyjemy w świecie obojętnym, pełnym cierpienia, pozbawionym łaski – jest zarazem pokrzepiająca. Pokazuje bowiem, że nawet w takim świecie można ocalić człowieczeństwo.